Neoconstitutionalism, new Latin American constitutionalism and constitutional processes in the Andean region
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to account for the importance attributed by the constitutions inspired by the so-called new Latin American constitutionalism to popular participation in matters of constitutional changes. To that extent, the analysis will be carried out in a comparative manner. To this end, in the first place, we differentiate between neoconstitutionalism and new Latin American constitutionalism. Later, we describe the influence of the new Latin American constitutionalism in the processes of creation and reform of the Constitutions of Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. Next Chapter is dedicated to Ecuador, one realizes the present inconsistency in terms of participation that exists between the model contemplated in the constitutional text and political and legal practice. Finally, there are five conclusions that shows the future way for a true participation in regional neoconstituionalism and some contradictions between dogmatic and organic part of Ecuadorian Constitution.
Downloads
References
Bobbio, N. (1993). Positivismo Jurídico. Trad. y estudio introductorio de Rafael de Asís Roig & Andrea Greppi. Madrid: Debate.
Colón Ríos, J. (XII-2015). Apuntes sobre Legitimidad Democráticas y Asambleas Constituyentes. Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica, 16, 1-11.
Comanducci, P. (2010). Constitucionalización y neoconstitucionalismo. En Canon Neocostitucional. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Gargarella, R. (11-14 de junio de 2015). Lo “viejo” del nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano. En Memorias Encuentro SELA. Río de Janeiro: Universidad de Yale.
Landau, D. (2015). Derechos Sociales y límites a la reforma constitucional: la influencia de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional colombiana en el derecho comparado. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Navas Alvear, M. (2012). Lo público insurgente. Crisis y construcción de la política en la esfera pública. Quito: Intiyan ediciones (Ciespal).
Parker, R.D. (1993). “Here the people rule”: A constitutional populist manifiesto. Valparaiso University Law Review, 27(3), 531-584.
Pisarello, G. (2014). Procesos constituyentes. Caminos para la ruptura democrática. Madrid: Trotta.
Ramírez Cleves, G. (2005). Límites de la reforma constitucional en Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Salazar Ugarte, P. (2013). El nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano. En El constitucionalismo contemporáneo. Homenaje a Jorge Carpizo, Luis
González Pérez & Diego Valadés (coords.). México: UNAM.
Salgado, H. (2009). El proceso constituyente de Ecuador. Algunas reflexiones. En Procesos constituyentes contemporáneos en América Latina.
Tendencias y perspectiva, José María Serna de la Garza (coord.). México: UNAM.
Sastre, S. (2005). La ciencia jurídica ante el neoconstitucionalismo. En Neoconstitucionalismo(s), Miguel Carbonell (ed.). Madrid: Trotta.
Viciano Pastor, R. & Martínez Dalmau, R. (2010). Aspectos Generales del nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano. En El nuevo constitucionalismo de América Latina. Memorias del encuentro internacional El nuevo constitucionalismo: desafíos y retos para el siglo XXI. Quito: Corte Constitucional Ecuador.
Normativa y jurisprudencia
Constitución Política del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia de 2009.
Constitución Política de Colombia de 1991 (Gaceta Constitucional, n° 114).
Constitución Política del Ecuador de 1998 y 2008.
Constitución de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela de 2009.
Corte Constitucional Ecuador, Dictamen 001-11-RC.
Corte Constitucional Ecuador, Dictamen 001-14-RC.
Ecuador, Mandato Constituyente n° 1 (R.O. Supl. 223, de 30-XI-2007).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
