Human rights, civil society, private law: correlation problems
Abstract
The category of “human rights and freedoms”, the problems of protection and protection of such rights have repeatedly been the subject of research, but the question of their correlation with concepts such as “civil society”, “private law” has not been studied yet. This circumstance determines the expediency of a special study of this issue. Several methodological techniques have been used in the process of exploring issues related to this article. The main ones were civilization and conceptual methods. With the help of the “civilization” method, we explored “law” as a category inseparably related to civilization. The “concept” method helps to consider law in general, and private law as a concept (conceptus from the Latin: thought, representation, concept), that is, as a set of verbal expressions of a social phenomenon denoted by a particular term. In the conclusion, the authors state that there is a conflict in the field of human rights and the conflict of interests of members of civil society, the state resorts to a positive legal regulation of human behavior (taking into account the national mentality and influencing the formation and transformation of justice in the desired direction). The study reveals that there are no grounds for excessive concern about the “infinity” of human rights. This boundary is usually defined naturally, in the face of the rights and interests of other members of civil society.
Downloads
References
Anners, E. (1996). History of European law. Moscow: Science.
Bartoshek, M. (1989). Roman law: (Concepts, terms, definitions). Moscow: Legal lit.
Bergel, J.-L. (2000). General theory of law. Moscow: Nota Bene.
Bilenchuk, P.D., Gvozdetsky, V.D. & Slivka, S.S. (1999). Philosophy of Law. Kyiv: Attica.
Chicherin, B.N. (1998). The philosophy of law. Saint Petersburg: Science.
Dzhyn, L. K. (2003). Andrew Arato. Civil society and political theory. Moscow: All World Publishing House.
Entin, L.M., Naku, A.A. & Vodolagin, S.V. (2001). European law. Moscow: Norma-Infra.
Gellner, E. (2004). Conditions of freedom. Civil society and its historical rivals. Moscow: Moscow School of Political Studies.
Gennarini, S. (2014). European Court: Gay marriage is not a human right. Retrieved from https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/european-court-gay-marriage-is-not-a-human-right (11-XII-2019).
Giro, T. (2006). Political science. Kharkov: Publishing house of the Humanitarian Center.
Halfina, R.O. (1974). General doctrine of legal relationship. Moscow: Legal. lit.
Hayek, F.A. von. (1999). Cognition, competition and freedom. Saint Petersburg: Direct- Media.
Howard, M.M. (2009). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Moscow: Aspect-Press.
Janice, M., Kay, R., & Bradley, E. (1997). European Human Rights Law: Sources and Practices. Kyiv: ArtEC.
Jaskiernia, J., & Spryszak, K. (Eds). (2016). European Human Rights System. Universal inspiration - cultural conditions - implementation barriers. Torun: Adam Marszałek.
Jellinek, G. (2004). General Doctrine of the State. Santi Petersburg.: Publishing House “Legal Center Press”.
Kernz, B. (2002). Introduction to European Union law. Kyiv: Knowledge.
Kharytonov, E., Kharytonova, O., Kharytonova, T., Kolodin, D. & Tolmachevska, Y. (2019). Human rights as the basic value of the concept of private law in modern Europe. Amazonia Investiga, 8(20), 477-485.
Kharytonov, E.O. (2006). Introduction to the Civil Law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Istina.
Kolodyi, A. (1998). Principles of Law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Jurinkom Inter.
Kolodyi, A. (2014). Civil society: signs, structural elements, relations with the state. Law of Ukraine, 4, 9-12.
Kuchinskyi, V.A. (1978). Personality. Liberty. Right. Moscow: Legal. lit.
Kuznetsova, N. (2014). Civil society, the state, private law: problems of correlation and interaction. Law of Ukraine, 4, 63-70.
Lotyuk, O.S. (2014). The question of the relationship between civil society and the state. Journal of the Kiev University of Law, 11(2), 13-18.
Lutz, A.V. (2003). European interstate legal systems and problems of integration with them of the legal system of Ukraine (theoretical aspects). Kyiv: Institute of State and Law. V.M. Koretsky NAS of Ukraine.
Medushevskyi, A.N. (2014). Is Russian legal tradition a pillar or an obstacle? Report and discussion. Moscow: The Liberal Mission Foundation.
Mises, L. von. (1999). The individual, the market and the rule of law. Saint Petersburg: Pnevma.
Muraveiv, V.I. (2011). European Union law. Kyiv: Jurinkom Inter.
Omelchuk, O.M. (2011). Human behavior: a philosophical and legal dimension. Khmelnitsky: Khmelnitsky University of Management and Law.
Onishchenko, N. (2014). On the question of finding a balance in the relationship between civil society and the state: theoretical and methodological aspects. Law of Ukraine, 4, 55-62
Onishchenko, N.M., Stoetsky, S.V. & Sunyegin, S.O. (2014). To the question of the responsibility of the state to civil society. Journal of the Kiev University of Law, 2, 9-13.
Paliyuk, V.P. (2003). Peculiarities of the application by the courts of Ukraine of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Mikolaev: Atoll.
Paliyuk, V.P. (2010). Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: Ukrainian law and the judiciary. Mykolaiv: Ilion LLC.
Pasko, I.T., & Pasko, E.I. (1999). Civil society and the national idea. (Ukraine against the backdrop of European processes). Donetsk: CSO of NAS of Ukraine, UK Center.
Petrazhitskyi, L.I. (2000). The theory of law and the state in connection with the theory of morality. Saint Petersburg.: Publishing House “Lan”.
Pronko, Y. (2014). Primitivism among jurists is something that is difficult to understand and comprehend. Retrieved from http://www.kasparov.ru/material.php?id=542E433E7DF16§ion_id=50A6C962A3D7C (13-XII-2019).
Rabinowitz, P. (Ed). (2006). Human rights: a socio-anthropological dimension: a collective monograph. Proceedings of the Lviv Laboratory for Human Rights and a Citizen of the Research Institute of State Construction and Local Self-Government of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine. Lviv: The World.
Savchin, M.V. (2015). Public Governance, Human Rights and Democracy: A Regional Cross-section of European Integration. Uzhgorod: Hoverla Publishing House.
Savigny, F.K. (2011). The system of modern Roman law. Moscow: Statute.
Shevchuk, S. (2006). Judicial protection of human rights: The case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in the context of the Western legal tradition. Kyiv: Abstract.
Smith, A. (2001). Welfare of Nations: Research on the Nature and Causes of Welfare of Nations. Kyiv: Port-Royal.
Souva, Don B. (2008). 125 Prohibited Films: The Censorship History of World Cinema. Ekaterinburg: Ultra-Culture.
Tatam, A. (1998). European Union Law. “Abris”.
Tolstopyatenko, G.P. (2001). European Tax Law. Comparative Legal Research. Moscow: Norm.
Topornin, B.N. (1998). European Law. Moscow: Lawperfyer.
Trebin, M. (2013). The Western Model of Civil Society: A Conceptual Approach. Gilea: a scientific bulletin, 75, 253-257.
Weller, M. (2007). Russia and Recipes. Moscow: AST Publishing House.
Zaichuk, O.V., Kopilenko, O.L. & Onischenko, N.M. (2009). Modern Legal Encyclopedia. Kyiv: Jurinkom Inter.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
