Reason and Democracy: The Potential Renewal of the Idea of Aristocracy

  • Pedro José Izquierdo
Keywords: Democracy, Representation, Discussion, Reason, Aristocracy

Abstract

This article studies the relationship between different kinds of discussion and the roles that they play in the diverse institutions of modern representative democracy. It distinguishes between three kinds of discussion: Platonic dialectic, deliberation, and democratic debate, and places them on a scale of decreasing attunement to rational standards of decision-making. It is argued that the more discussions are attuned to rational standards, the less democratic they become, because the less they are in sync with the mode of discussion that is proper to, and that in fact obtains in the demos. This tension between rational decision-making and democracy is identified as the tension between aristocracy and democracy as it was understood by the vast tradition of political philosophy, and suggests a way in which aristocracy may be reintroduced as a meaningful concept in modern constitutional thought. It is argued that only by acknowledging the existence of an aristocratic quality to rational decision-making is it possible to truly preserve the democratic character of representative institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pedro José Izquierdo

Universidad de Navarra. New York University School of Law

References

Adams, J. (1850-1856). C. Francis (ed.), The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States: with a Life of the Author, Notes and Illustrations, by his Grandson Charles Francis Adams. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.

Aristotle. Eudemian Ethics.

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics.

D’Ors, A. (2004). Derecho Privado Romano. Pamplona: EUNSA.

Ferejohn, J. (2000). Instituting Deliberative Democracy. In NOMOS XLII: Designing Democratic Institutions, ed. Ian Shapiro & Stephen

Macedo. New York: New York University Press.

Ferejohn, J. (2006). The Citizens’ Assembly Model. California: Stanford University.

Harrington, J. (1980). The Commonwealth of Oceana. In The Oceana and Other Works, With an Account of His Life, by John Toland, 2nd

Reprint of the Edition London 1771. Darmstadt: Scientia Verlag Aalen.

John Paul II. (1991). Encyclical Letter Centessimus Annus.

John Paul II. (1993). Catechism of the Catholic Church.

Leo XIII. (1892). Encyclical Letter Rerum Novarum.

Madison, J. (2003). Federalist. En A. Hamilton, J. Madison & J. Jay, The Federalist. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mill, J.S. (2010). Considerations on Representative Government. En General Books, XIII. Memphis: Books LLC.

Pius XI. (1931). Encyclical Letter Quadragesimo Anno.

Plato. Gorgias.

Schmitt, C. (1988). The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. E. Kennedy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Sieyès, E.J. (1789). Vues sur les moyens d'exécution dont les représentants de la France pourront disponer. Paris.

Taylor, R.J. & et al. (1977-2006). Papers of John Adams, vol. II. Cambridge & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Thomas Aquinas. (1232). Summa Theologiæ.
Published
2012-12-30
How to Cite
Izquierdo, P. (2012). Reason and Democracy: The Potential Renewal of the Idea of Aristocracy. Ius Humani. Law Journal, 3, 51-76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v3i0.29
Section
Papers