Features of Criminal Proceedings (Pre-Trial and Trial Investigation) in the Time of Pandemic Covid-19
Abstract
The work is devoted to the main problems and features that have emerged in the field of criminal justice (pre-trial investigation and trial) in a pandemic. The relevance of this article is that criminal justice, like other areas of human activity, has been affected after the spread of Covid-19 and its recognition as a pandemic. The introduction of quarantine was accompanied by some problematic issues, including uncertainty in the work of the judiciary and law enforcement agencies, lack of a unified approach to court schedules, and the conduct of certain investigative actions. Thus, it is necessary to analyze the peculiarities of criminal proceedings in a pandemic. An explorative and collative methodology (that considers the comparative law) was used. The proposals have been made to address the problems that arise during the pre-trial investigation and criminal proceedings in a pandemic, in particular: the need to allow videoconferencing in criminal proceedings out of court; a list of programs for video communication have been defined; to provide adequate funding for technical re-equipment; to suspend the terms of criminal proceedings, and; to prevent in the future the situation of cancellation of previously adopted decisions on the strengthening of criminal liability for intentional infection.
Downloads
References
Chawinga, W. D., Chawinga, C., Khumbo Kapondera, S., Chipeta, G. T., Majawa, F. & Nyasulu, C. (2019). Towards e‐judicial services in Malawi: Implications for justice delivery. The electronic journal of information systems in developing countries, 82(2). In https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/isd2.12121.
Chernychenko, I. V. (2013). Peculiarities of realization of separate bases of criminal proceedings of Ukraine during application of video conference. Criminal law and criminology, 4, 332-336. In http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/Chkup_2013_4_82.pdf.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols n° 11 and 14 (1950).
Economic truth. (2019). The number of Internet users in Ukraine increased by 7%. In https://www.epravda.com.ua/rus/news/2019/10/11/652498/.
Fisyn, V. & Kostrikova, E. (2020). Quarantine proceedings. Legal Newspaper. In https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/inshe/karantinne-sudochinstvo.html.
Jennings, W.G. & Perez, N.M. (2020). The Immediate Impact of Covid-19 on Law Enforcement in the United States. Nature Public Health Emergency Collection, 6, 1-12. In https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275851/.
Legal Newspaper. (2020). Life goes on, or as the courts continue to operate under quarantine. In https://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/zhittya-trivae-abo-yak-sudi-prodovzhut-pracyuvati-v-umovah-karantinu.html.
Nazaruk, O.I. & Kovaleva, R.Y. (2017). Videoconferencing mode in criminal proceedings: advantages and disadvantages. Criminal law and criminology, 1, 307-311. In http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/Chkup_2017_1_69.pdf.
Russian Federation. (2020). On Amendments to the Criminal Code and Articles 31 and 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: Law 100-FZ. In http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202004010073?index=1&rangeSize=1.
Safir, F. (2020). History of court videoconferences in Ukraine. Legal Newspaper Online. In https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/sudova-praktika/istoriya-sudovih-videokonferenciy-v-ukrayini.html.
Serdyuk, L.R. (2016). Regulatory and legal support for the introduction of electronic justice in Ukraine. Young scholar, 3(30), 500-505. In http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2016/3/118.pdf.
Shapran, K. (2020). The status of criminal proceedings—“in quarantine”: the results of the first month. In https://thepage.ua/ua/experts/status-kriminalnogo-provadzhennya-na-karantini.
Suk, A. (2019). Pre-trial investigation: problems in the activity of an investigating judge. Gazeta Sug. In https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/138321-dosudove-rozsliduvannya-problemi-u-diyalnosti-slidchogo-suddi.
Turanjanin, V. & Radulovic, D. (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-19) and Possibilities for Criminal Law Reaction in Europe: A Review. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 49, 4-11. In https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340983448_Coronavirus_Covid-19_and_Possibilities_for_Criminal_Law_Reaction_in_Europe_A_Review.
Ukraine. (1991). Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine: Law 1798-XII. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12.
Ukraine. (1996). Constitution of Ukraine. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80. 10.
Ukraine. (2004). Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine: Law 1618-IV. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15.
Ukraine. (2005). Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine: Law 2747-IV. In https://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15.
Ukraine. (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Law 4651-VI. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/4651-17.
Ukraine. (2016). On the judiciary and the status of judges: Law 1402-VIII. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19.
Ukraine. (2020). Electronic court. What it is? In the official website: https://wiki.court.gov.ua/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6848551.
Ukraine. (2020). On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Aimed at Providing Additional Social and Economic Guarantees in Connection with the Spread of Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19): Law 540-IX. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/540-20
Ukraine. (2020). On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Aimed at Preventing the Occurrence and Spread of Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19): Law 530-IX. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/530-20#Text.
Ukraine. (2020). On Amendments to Paragraph 20-5 of Section XI “Transitional Provisions” of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine on the peculiarities of judicial control over the rights, freedoms and interests of persons in criminal proceedings and consideration of certain issues during court proceedings for the period of quarantine The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine in order to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease (Covid-19): Law 558-IX. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/558-20#Text.
Ukraine. (2020). On protection of the population from infectious diseases: Law 1645-III. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1645-14.
Ukraine. Cabinet of Ministers. (2020). On prevention of the spread of coronavirus Covid-19 on the territory of Ukraine: Resolution 211. In https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-vnesennya-zmin-do-postanovi-kabinetu-ministriv-ukrm020420ayini-vid-11-bereznya-2020-r-211.
Ukraine. Chairman of the Council of Judges. (2020). Letter 9rs-186/20. In http://rsu.gov.ua/uploads/news/no9rs-18620-vid-16032020-verhovn-92b86c6546.pdf.
Ukraine. Communication Department of the National Police. (2020). In megacities one police investigator investigates 300 criminal proceedings. In https://mvs.gov.ua/ua/news/20954_U_megapolisah_odin_slidchiy_policii_rozslidu_300_kriminalnih_provadzhen__Maksim_Cuckiridze.htm.
Ukraine. High Council of Justice. (2020). On access to justice in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 coronary virus pandemic of acute respiratory disease Covid-19: Decision. In https://court.gov.ua/press/news/916824/.
Ukraine. Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. (2017). On the organization of investigative units of the National Police of Ukraine: Order 570. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0918-17#Text.
Ukraine. National Anti-Corruption Bureau. (2020). The work of NABU public receptions and personal reception of citizens has been temporarily suspended. In https://nabu.gov.ua/novyny/robotu-gromadskyh-pryymalen-nabu-ta-osobystyy-pryyom-gromadyan-tymchasovo-pryzupyneno.
Ukraine. Office of the Prosecutor General. (2020). On April 30, the pilot of the eCase system of electronic criminal proceedings will start in the anti-corruption bodies. In https://www.gp.gov.ua/ua/news?_m=publications&_c=view&_t=rec&id=270374.
Ukraine. Prosecutor General. (2020). On suspension of carrying out personal reception of citizens: the Order 147. In https://www.gp.gov.ua/ua/iord?_m=publications&_t=rec&id=262782.
Ukraine. Prosecutor General’s Office. (2020). Report on criminal offenses in the country for 2020. In https://old.gp.gov.ua/ua/stst2011.html?dir_id=114140&libid=100820&c=edit&_c=fo#.
Ukraine. State Judicial Administration. (2018). On testing the subsystem “Electronic Court” in local and appellate courts began operation of the subsystem “Electronic Court” in test mode: Order. In https://dsa.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/628_18.pdf.
Ukraine. State Judicial Administration. (2020). On amendments to the Procedure for working with technical means of videoconferencing during a court hearing in administrative, civil and commercial proceedings with the participation of the parties outside the courtroom: Order 196. In https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/.
Ukraine. State Judicial Administration. (2020). On the introduction into the trial operation of the subsystems Electronic Court and Electronic Cabinet: Order 247. In https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/inshe/14/N_247_20.
Ukraine. Supreme Court of Ukraine. (2010). On some issues that arise during the consideration by the courts of Ukraine of complaints against the decisions of the bodies of inquiry, investigator, prosecutor on the initiation of a criminal case: Resolution 6. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0006700-10#Text.
Ukraine. Zhovtnevyi District Court. (2020). Decision 212/5119/20. In http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91046694.
United Nations. (1955). Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. In https://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/UN_Standard_Minimum_Rules_for_the_Treatment_of_Prisoners.pdf.
United Nations. (1988). Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment: General Assembly Resolution 43/173. In https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/DetentionOrImprisonment.aspx.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
