Relationship Between the Guarantee and Punitivity in the Criminal Code
Abstract
The objective of this article is to determine the need for the existence of a punitive and a guarantor party within the Integrated Criminal Code, starting from the study of the doctrinal updating in criminal matters within the Ecuadorian legal system considering that since Ecuador is a constitutional State Of rights and justice, inspires us to construct mechanisms that have as basis and aim the protection of the freedoms of the individual, against the various forms of the arbitrary exercise of punitive power of the State, where the guarantees and principles established in the Code Organic Integral Criminal, should be considered as punitive power containment filters that prevent that power from overflowing and destroying everything in its path. Then the meaning of the guarantee and punitivity is analyzed. Finally, we consider the relationship between guarantee and punitivity, concluding that the guaranty is a current that provides substantial ideas to transform the judicial process thus preventing the arbitrariness of punitive power.
Downloads
References
Balestena, E. (2006). La fábrica penal: visión interdisciplinaria del sistema punitivo. Montevideo: B de F.
Beccaria, C., Dragonetti, J. & Cabanellas, G. (1993). Tratado de los delitos y de las penas. Buenos Aires: Heliasta.
Rafecas, D. (2006). Una aproximación al concepto de garantismo penal. Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Ferrajoli, L. (1995). Derecho y razón: teoría del garantismo penal. Madrid: Trotta.
Gascón, M. (2005). Garantismo. Estudios sobre el pensamiento jurídico de Luigi Ferrajoli. Madrid: Trotta.
Lea, J. (2006). Delito y modernidad nuevas argumentaciones en la criminología realista de izquierda. (1. ed). México, D.F: Ed. Coyoacán.
Kindhäuser, U. & López Díaz, C. (2001). Derecho penal de la culpabilidad y conducta peligrosa. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, Centro de
Investigaciones de Derecho Penal y Filosofía del Derecho.
Ávila Santamaría, R. (2015). El Código Integral Penal (COIP) y su potencial aplicación garantista. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar/ Corporación Editora Nacional
Rodríguez Morales, A.J. (2004). Reflexiones sobre la situación actual del Derecho penal: Estudios de Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal. Caracas: Ediciones Líber.
Sousa Santos, B. (2002). Hacia una concepción multicultural de los derechos humanos. Bogotá: ILSA.
Zaffaroni, E.R. (2006). El enemigo en el derecho penal. Buenos Aires: Ediar.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
